Scientists who have been studying the effects of restoring the wolf population in areas like Yellowstone National Park have found a surprising twist in this often emotional story. While the return of these fierce hunters has been tough on their prey, it apparently has made it possible for many other creatures to survive and flourish because of changing eating habits of large herbivores, including elk. Now that the wolves are back, elk are less likely to feed in areas where they might be at risk, and that has facilitated the natural recovery of riverbanks and other areas that are so critical to beavers, birds, insects and other animals. So while many researchers have been focusing on the lethal impact of the restoration of wolves, the fear of wolves by some animals has possibly had an even more dramatic impact on the entire region. ... The areas where the elk had ceased to dine tended to be in gullies or along riverbanks or near a steep cliff. That would be a tough area to escape from a pack of wolves, and the elk apparently had figured out that they needed to stay in areas here they could see the wolves long before they became a threat, and then retreat to safer ground if it became necessary. And the result of that was fairly dramatic. The researchers found that areas abandoned by elk were filled with new growth, not just of willows and aspen that elk normally feed on, but bushes and grasses and smaller plants that protect stream banks. Once browsing decreases, the plants are free to grow, and a number of different ecosystem functions can be restored.I just thought this was interesting.
I think I like Miami's chances out East. Oh, by the way, I like the Diesel.|W|P|110303893951908269|W|P|Shaq Daddy|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.comShaquille O'Neal kept his word to injured teammate Dwyane Wade on Monday night.
O'Neal scored a season-high 40 points after Wade left in the first half with a sprained left ankle, helping the Heat win their season-high fifth straight, a 106-83 victory over the Washington Wizards.
Wade badly wanted to keep playing , but O'Neal wouldn't let him.
"He was limping real bad," O'Neal said. "I told him, 'Flash, take the game off. I'll go out and do the work.'
"He said, 'If I'm going to take it easy, you have to get 40 or 50.' I told him, 'I've got your back."
Team | Record | Head to Head | Divisonal | Common | Conf. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Green Bay | 8-5 | 1-0 | 3-1 | 5-5 | 7-3 |
Minnesota | 7-6 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 6-4 | 4-5 |
-- Beat Detroit, lose to Washington, and Packers lose to Chicago or Jacksonville. The Vikings would win based on a better divisional record or better common opponents (all remaining games are common opponent games, except of course, Packers v. Vikes).
-- Beat Washington, lose to Detroit and Packers lose to Chicago. If the Packers would beat Jacksonville, the Vikings win the tiebreaker based on a better common opponent record.
-- Packers lose to Chicago and Jacksonville. If the Vikings lose to Detroit and Washington, the Vikings win on better common opponent record.
Had the Vikings won today, they could have won the division by losing to the Pack and winning their other two games and having the Pack lose their other two games or beating the Pack and: -- Win their other two games (same as above)-- Beat Detroit, lose to Washington, and Packers lose to either Chicago or Jacksonville (same as above)
-- Beat Washington, lose to Detroit and Packers lose to Chicago. (same as above)
--The Packers lose both games (same as above).
The only thing they lost relative to the Packers was that they can't lose to the Packers and win the North. And that was an unlikely scenario anyway.
On the other hand, had the Vikings won today but lost to Detroit, they could win the North only if they beat the Packers and Washington, and Green Bay lost all three remaining games. Similarly, if they won today, but lost to Washington, they would have to beat Detroit and Green Bay and have the Packers lose to Chicago. So, losing to Seattle was the right move, if you were going to lose one of the last four games. And that's about all the positive I can get out of today.
|W|P|110291316150535763|W|P|Trying to Make a Silk Purse from a Sow's Ear|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.com0:44 74-68 Tracy McGrady Personal Foul. 0:44 Devin Brown made Free 75-68 Throw 1 of 2. 0:44 Devin Brown made Free 76-68 Throw 2 of 2. 0:35 76-71 Tracy McGrady made 26 ft three point jumper. 0:31 76-71 Bob Sura 6th Personal Foul. 0:31 Devin Brown made Free 77-71 Throw 1 of 2. 0:31 Devin Brown made Free 78-71 Throw 2 of 2. 0:24 78-74 Tracy McGrady made 26 ft three point jumper. 0:24 Tim Duncan Shooting Foul. 78-74 0:24 78-75 Tracy McGrady made Free Throw 1 of 1. 0:24 San Antonio Full Timeout. 0:16 78-75 Scott Padgett Personal Foul. 0:16 Tim Duncan made Free 79-75 Throw 1 of 2. 0:16 Tim Duncan made Free 80-75 Throw 2 of 2. 0:16 Houston Full Timeout. 0:11 80-78 Tracy McGrady made 26 ft three point jumper. 0:11 San Antonio Full Timeout. 0:07 Devin Brown Lost Ball. 80-78 Stolen by Tracy McGrady. 0:01 80-81 Tracy McGrady made 26 ft three point jumper. 0:00 Tony Parker missed 27 ft 80-81 three pointer. 0:00 End of the 4th Quarter. 0:00 End GameAn interesting note. In the last 45 seconds of the game, these two teams combined for 19 points, an outstanding pace of 25 points per minute. In the previous 47:15, they companed for only 142 points, or 3 points per minute. Of course, as a T-Wolves fan, every San Antonio loss is a good game. This game could be a real difference maker -- it could possibly determine home court advantage in the Conference Finals. (I know, I'm getting ahead of myself.) Remember yesterday, I was talking about how hard the T-Wolves schedule is? Just a footnote. No team in the league has played fewer home games than the Timberwolves. The T-Wolves have played just 7 home games. Every other team in the Western Conference has played at least nine. Denver has played 13! The schedule is decidedly less rough for the hometown five in the second half. However, they are playing a home game tonight and SBG will be there. |W|P|110267455601342294|W|P|Paging Reggie Miller|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.com
If only Ndudi were available. Imagine the possiblities... |W|P|110263688367198190|W|P|Can the T-Wolves Soldier On?|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.comForward Ndudi Ebi, on the injured list since the season began with what was classified as left knee tendinitis, managed to get hurt worse while rehabbing. He developed a stress fracture in his left foot and will be in a walking cast for four to six weeks.
No. | Player | Rebounds |
50 | Dale Davis | 8040 |
51 | Happy Hairston | 8019 |
52 | John Havlicek | 8007 |
53 | Oscar Robertson | 7804 |
54 | Caldwell Jones | 7663 |
55 | Sam Perkins | 7661 |
56 | Clyde Lee | 7626 |
57 | Wayne Embry | 7544 |
58 | Maurice Lucas | 7520 |
59 | Scottie Pippen | 7494 |
60 | Kevin Garnett | 7493 |
61 | James Donaldson | 7492 |
62 | Larry Nance | 7352 |
63 | Chet Walker | 7314 |
64 | Anthony Mason | 7279 |
65 | Truck Robinson | 7267 |
No. | Player | Rebounds |
50 | Dale Davis | 8040 |
51 | Happy Hairston | 8019 |
52 | John Havlicek | 8007 |
53 | Oscar Robertson | 7804 |
54 | Kevin Garnett | 7757 |
55 | Caldwell Jones | 7663 |
56 | Sam Perkins | 7661 |
57 | Clyde Lee | 7626 |
58 | Wayne Embry | 7544 |
59 | Maurice Lucas | 7520 |
60 | Scottie Pippen | 7494 |
61 | James Donaldson | 7492 |
62 | Larry Nance | 7352 |
63 | Chet Walker | 7314 |
64 | Anthony Mason | 7279 |
65 | Truck Robinson | 7267 |
"It's frustrating it's come down to the final day," said Koskie, who wouldn't say whether he's been told the Twins' latest offer is their last, adding only, "if it is I'm not here."And here's some language regarding Radke's situation:
Radke has a three-year, $21 million offer from the Twins; Koskie has a two-year, $7.5 million offer. Both are believed to be take-it-or-leave-it offers, although Radke's offer might have room to grow slightly, perhaps into the neighborhood of the three-year, $22.5 million contract the New York Mets gave Kris Benson, the highest-paid free agent signed so far this offseason. That still is not expected to be enough to reach agreement with Radke, who made $10 million in 2004. Koskie made $4.5 million. "I hope we can get something done," said Radke's agent, Ron Simon, who added that Benson's signing doesn't set the free-agent market in his mind, especially for his client, whom he considers a more elite pitcher. "We need a few more signings to have a complete market... . It might not get done."And here's Terry Ryan, hoping against hope:
"We're talking, which is good," Ryan said. "These two guys are important to us, and I'd like to have them both back. We've got a lot to offer, I think, and that's the one good thing, as far as familiarity, the recent success, the comfort level. Both of them know as much as there is to know about the organization. We have that going for us. "If we wind up getting into a situation where it's dollars � which I don't believe it ever would be with these two guys � it's just a matter of how much they want to play here and how much they want to leave on the table as opposed to going elsewhere. That's about what it comes down to."Personally, if I were Radke or Koskie, I'd be out of here. That's what I would do if I were in their situation. This is the frustation of being a Twins fan. We are just hoping that guys will somehow make decisions that are fundamentally against their own economic interests. But hey, it's possible. Just think back about a month ago when millions of people acted in precisely the same way. |W|P|110248323629502182|W|P|Past the Deadline|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.com
It wasn't known whether Minnesota would offer arbitration to Eric Milton, who has been talking with the New York Yankees.That's good stuff. |W|P|110246069036323006|W|P|More Crack Reporting from CBS Sportsline|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.com
STICK AND BALL GUY'S 2004 TWINS ANALYZER | ||||
Corey Koskie 6'3" 219 Lbs. Age: 31 L/R 3B | ||||
AVE: .251 | OBP: .342 | SLG: .495 | GPA: .278 | |
G: 118 | AB: 422 | HR: 25 | RBI: 71 |
Offense
No question about it. 2004 was a down year for Corey Koskie offensively. Or was it? Koskie's batting average plunged to .251, his lowest since he got a regular job in the majors. Correspondingly, his on base percentage was his lowest. However, Koskie's .495 slugging percentage was his career high and his 25 home runs were one short of his career high (in 140 less at bats). Koskie's .837 OPS was one point higher than his career average.
Koskie has been a very good offensive player, probably moreso than most people realize. As I alluded to above, Koskie has a career OPS of .836 -- that's just .001 lower than Kirby Puckett's career OPS. (Koskie's OPS+ isn't as close to Puckett's 115 to 124, OPS is a measure comparing a player to the league average and is park adjusted. 100 is average.) Among AL third basemen with at least 250 plate appearances, Koskie was 7th in OPS. He was 6th in 2003, 4th in 2002, and 3rd in 2001. Relative to his peers, he's been good, although he used to be better. Actually, I was a little surprised that Koskie rates as low as he does. I thought he was much higher.
Unlike a lot of Twins players who swing the bat at just about any pitch, Koskie is selective and patient. He is usually among the team leaders in walks and walks per plate appearance. However, he may be too selective. I heard somewhere that he lead the AL in called third strikes in 2003 with over 50 strike outs looking! Bottom line -- Koskie is a nice offensive player, even when his batting average has slipped. He draws walks and hits the ball over the fence. He's not the best player in the league, but he's been one of the best Twins offensively for the last several years.
Defense
Twins fans have gotten used to the idea that Koskie is an excellent defensive player. I believe that this perception is true. In 2004, Koskie trailed only Eric Chavez, Joe Randa, and Alex Rodriguez among AL third basemen in Range Factor, which is the percentage of balls hit in his area of the field that he fielded. In 2003, he was first, in 2002 he was third and in 2001 he was second. This data supports what Twins have seen. Koskie gets to balls. He jumps, he dives, he moves. He throws well. He comes in well. He's a very good defensive player.
Salary
Is this a consideration? Just kidding. If you don't know that Koskie is a free agent, then you aren't much of a Twins fan. He made $4,500,000 in 2004. The Twins have offered him, I believe, a 2 year, $8 million contract. In the world of major league baseball outside of the Metrodome, he's worth more than $4 million a year. Easy. Except...
Durability
Koskie has been hurt a lot. He played just 118 games in 2004. He's played more than 140 games just twice in his six years as a regular. This is the biggest problem with Koskie. He's had a bad back, he's had a back ankle, strained sternum, and a bad wrist all in the past two years. It's hard to say it, because I like Koskie, but he appears to be injury prone. Perhaps his willingness to play hurt has lead to more injury. Whatever the situation, his durability, or lack thereof, should give anyone pause who is considering signing him to a long term deal.
Intangibles
Koskie got probably the most important hit of the season for the Twins in 2004 when he homered to beat the Cleveland Indians on a Sunday in August when it looked for all the world that the Indians would pull even with the Twins in the AL Central. He got very hot right at the best possible time and was a major spark plug for the Twins when they pulled away from the competition (until he got hurt). Koskie has been a big part of the Twins success over the last four years.
In the long run, he's probably going to be remembered only as a good major league player. He's not an elite player in the league. He's not going to ever get a $10 million a year contract. But, he's a very good player, who plays very hard. If he can stay healthy, he should have a couple of good years left in him. At 31, he's certainly headed on the downward slide, especially considering his history of injuries. I'd be surprised if he hit more homeruns in 2005 than he did in 2004. I would not be surprised if he battled injuries the rest of his career.
Prediction
I'd love to see the Twins sign Koskie to a two-year deal with a team option for a third year. I don't believe that Koskie will take a lot less money to stay with the Twins. It seems that his status will be resolved soon. I will predict that Koskie will sign elsewhere. I hope I'm wrong.
|W|P|110202484823269647|W|P|2004 Twins -- Corey Koskie|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.comThe law requires grand jurors to conduct their deliberations in closed sessions. Grand jurors are also sworn to secrecy and must not reveal what occurs in their private sessions to persons other than fellow grand jurors seated as a body. The courts have consistently upheld the principle of grand jury secrecy. For one reason, grand jurors sometimes receive complaints from the community about public officials or other persons. Some complaints are made vindictively or are otherwise so outrageous that if they were made public, a reputation could be severely damaged. The secrecy of grand jury proceedings also allows grand jurors during their sessions to discuss all aspects of an issue without fear of it becoming a divisive issue in the community.
Whoever it was that leaked this information has broken their sworn oath of secrecy. That is despicable. Understand that Grand Juries are used to make the decision whether to indict the accused or not. If the charges are without merit or the prosecution has not provided enough evidence to indict, the proceedings should not see the light of day. Of course, the details in this case are juicy (pardon the pun). They show Bonds and Giambi in a negative and scandalous light. People are outraged by the testimony. A little of that outrage should be reserved for those who have violated the privacy afforded to those who testify at grand jury proceedings.
|W|P|110221532108220751|W|P|Cooking With Gas|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.com