Reason to sign him: Provides right-handed pop, evidenced by 25 homers and 71 RBI in 422 at-bats last season. He's a Canadian -- something that could be a positive for the Blue Jays.I'm pretty sure that Mr. Koskie hit all 25 of those home runs left handed. |W|P|110183113888828848|W|P|In Depth Analysis from CBS|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.com
Eastern Conference | |
Atlantic Division | 17 Games under .500 |
Central Division | 2 Games under .500 |
Southeast Division | 4 Games under .500 |
Western Conference | |
Northwest Division | 18 Games over .500 |
Pacific Division | 9 Games over .500 |
Southwest Division | 4 Games under .500 |
With more than 300 players who weigh more than 300 pounds, the NFL doesn't need a salary cap. It needs a weight cap. (And some slimming pinstripes wouldn't hurt, either.) How would a weight cap work? You couldn't just place a maximum on the entire roster's weight, because teams would simply circumvent that rule by signing five or so vegan marathoners. Instead, the league should declare that a team can never have more than 2,800 pounds on the field at one time. The rule wouldn't be difficult to enforce -- just bring in those big truck scales the highway departments use, and place one on each sideline. And it wouldn't take any additional time, either. During a possession change, timeout or commercial break, officials could have the respective offense and defense go over to the sideline and jump on the scales. If it's over the 2,800-pound limit, the team gets nailed for a 10-yard penalty and has to substitute lighter players. Sure, a weight-cap sounds goofy. But it really isn't when you think about it. The players would be smaller, which means they'd be quicker. Offenses and defenses would be more efficient, because leaner, quicker lines can move the ball and defend better than their sluggish counterparts. The Broncos, after all, currently have the lightest offense in the AFC, but are fourth in the conference in yards per game. The Bills, meanwhile, have the heaviest offense in the AFC, and are next-to-last in yards per game. More importantly, players would be healthier and sustain fewer injuries. And there would be all sorts of entertaining new strategies. Teams would sign skinny guys just to get under the cap. Or maybe they could bring in their special South Beach Diet packages for short-yardage situations: seven 300-plus-pound linemen and four sub-150-pound defensive backs.I think that the league should institute a maximum weight for players AND an average weight requirement for the team. I also think that the league should limit rosters to 40 players and eliminate headsets in the quarterback's helmets. Think this is crazy? At one time, the rosters were 40 players. At one time, quarterbacks didn't have headsets. At one time the league was about players making plays, not about situational substitutions, fat guys mucking up the running game, and technology usurping onfield creativity. I'd be a little more interested in the "no huddle" if I knew that the offensive coordinator wasn't talking to the quarterback. Bring back that league -- the league of the 1960s and 1970s -- and maybe I'll be a little more interested. |W|P|110131898382782750|W|P|ESPN Broaches Idea of Weight Cap in NFL|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.com
NBA games are played for the fans, and for the fans only. It has nothing to do with the players. I cannot imagine a scenario that would come up that would cause a player to go into the stands and attack the fans. NBA Commissioner David Stern was just too nice, and the penalties he handed out � a season long suspension for Ron Artest and long-term suspensions for Stephen Jackson and Jermaine O�Neal, among others � were inappropriately lenient.Bill is known to use hyperbole on occasion to make a point. In this case, he's calling for termination some of the players involved. That's a little harsh, but there is no doubting that this incident raises a lot of questions about the relationship between athletes and fans. Stick and Ball Guy has been thinking about this relationship for some time. More to come later.|W|P|110122354295961580|W|P|Bill Walton on the Detroit Melee and its Aftermath|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.com
STICK AND BALL GUY'S 2004 TWINS ANALYZER | ||||
Michael Cuddyer 6'2" 222 Lbs. Age: 25 R/R UT | ||||
AVE: .263 | OBP: .339 | SLG: .440 | GPA: .263 | |
G: 115 | AB: 339 | HR: 12 | RBI: 45 |
Offense
Michael Cuddyer is a decent offensive player. Let's get that out there right away. He hit 12 home runs in 339 at bats (a much better rate than Lew Ford). He slugged about the same as Ford overall, despite his much lower batting average. His OPS of .779 isn't Oh-My-God-Wonderful, but it's a helluva lot better than, say, Luis Rivas'. His OBP is a little better than average (and .009 better than Torii Hunter). No question, Mike can hold his own. And he's still only had 571 at bats at the major league level.
Mike's biggest problem is that he strikes out a whole lot (74 times in those 339 at bats). I've seen times when he seems pretty clueless out there. Even so, his numbers have improved and he's still only 25 years old. Mike's a big upgrade offensively at 2B from Rivas, no question.
Defense
Mike's not a great defensive player, but I think he'll be adequate. If he does play second base, I think he can be passable. Considering that Rivas has pretty lousy range, I don't particularly shudder when I think of Cuddyer playing second. Did I mention that he's a better hitter than Rivas?
Salary
Serfdom.
Durability
Cuddyer has had some injury problems. He had a neck problem in 2004 and was hurt a fair amount in 2003. I don't think he's got any major problems, but he's not Cal Ripken, Jr., either. Some injury risk here.
Intangibles
What can you say about Cuddyer except that he needs to play. He's a big strong kid with punch. He's still only 25 years old. I like his punch, he hits right handers respectably (.245/.317/.421 last year). I think that if he gets 500 to 600 plate appearances, he will have better numbers. He's got to play. He's got to play every day. He's got to play second base every day.
Projection
SBG predicts that Michael Cuddyer will again be a part time player. 2005 will bring about more frustration for Twins fans (and Cuddyer) when he does not crack the every day lineup. This seems ludicrous, I suppose. How could he not play 2nd or 3rd? I think he should play second, but part of me says he won't. Man, I'd like to be proven wrong here.
|W|P|110082617494773993|W|P|2004 Twins -- Michael Cuddyer|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.comPosition | Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
1 | Kareem Abdul-Jabbar | 38387 | 17440 | 5660 |
2 | Karl Malone | 36928 | 14968 | 5248 |
3 | Wilt Chamberlain | 31419 | 23924 | 4643 |
4 | Oscar Robertson | 26710 | 7804 | 9887 |
5 | John Havlicek | 26395 | 8007 | 6114 |
6 | Charles Barkley | 23757 | 12546 | 4215 |
7 | Elgin Baylor | 23149 | 11463 | 3650 |
8 | Larry Bird | 21791 | 8974 | 5695 |
9 | Jack Sikma | 17287 | 10816 | 3488 |
10 | Bill Russell | 14522 | 21620 | 4100 |
11 | Kevin Garnett | 14037 | 7604 | 3106 |
Position | Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
1 | Kareem Abdul-Jabbar | 38387 | 17440 | 5660 |
2 | Wilt Chamberlain | 31419 | 23924 | 4643 |
3 | Oscar Robertson | 26710 | 7804 | 9887 |
4 | John Havlicek | 26395 | 8007 | 6114 |
5 | Larry Bird | 21791 | 8974 | 5695 |
6 | John Stockton | 19711 | 4051 | 15806 |
7 | Magic Johnson | 17707 | 6559 | 10141 |
8 | Marc Jackson | 12489 | 4963 | 10334 |
I don't think that Buster is reading my little web page. If he did, he'd have read this about Sammy Sosa back in September when assessing whether he'd get to 700 home runs:By last summer, however, Sosa's average had plummeted to .253, the third consecutive season of decline in his batting average. Pitchers no longer fear Sosa with runners on base; in fact, they can't wait to throw to him, because the potential for a rally-killing strikeout is enormous, and as Sosa remained entrenched far away from home plate, they spun breaking balls low and away repeatedly.
And Sosa swung and missed, repeatedly, reverting to the undisciplined style that plagued him as a young player. He had 133 whiffs in 478 at-bats, and his walks dropped to 56 -- or less than half of what he had in 2001. His batting average with runners in scoring position was .228, with 36 strikeouts in 125 at-bats. Twenty-three of his 35 homers came with the bases empty.
Barry Bonds has remained a great hitter into his 40s, in large part because of his plate discipline and his command of the strike zone. Even if Bonds' power had eroded in recent years, his walks and his batting average would have still remained high; he's always been a disciplined hitter. Sosa is not, never has been, and his problems at the plate will only grow more acute as he gets older.
See, it's pretty obvious that Sammy is in decline. Even Olney sees it. Fact is, the Cubs are dying to get rid of him. I, for one, would be very happy to see him leave the Northsiders. With his huge contract, he seems untradeable. Never fear, here come the Mets to take him off the Cubs' hands. If they actually trade for Sosa, it'll be the dumbest thing they've done since they traded for Mo Vaughn. |W|P|110082664955625837|W|P|Hey Folks, It's Not Rocket Science|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.comIn 2001, Sammy had his third year of sixty plus homers, only to be overshadowed by Bonds' 73. Think about it. Sosa hit 60 three times and not once did he lead the league in homers in those years. The next year, he dropped off by 15 home runs, to 49. In 2003, another drop, to 40. And now, in 2004, Sosa is "off the radar" at just 29 with three weeks to go. What has caused this drop? Well, for one thing, Sammy has always been a free swinger. And when I say free swinger, I mean F-R-E-E-S-W-I-N-G-E-R. As of right now, Sosa has 2091 career strikeouts, second only to Reggie Jackson. Look at his strikeout numbers since 1995.
Year
At Bat SO SO/AB
1995
564
134
.237
1996
498
134
.269
1997
642
174
.271
1998
643
171
.266
1999
625
171
.274
2000
604
168
.278
2001
577
153
.265
2002
556
144
.259
2003
517
143
.277
2004
397
114
.287
Wow. He's struck out a ton. You might say, so what, so what! He's hit a ton of home runs, too! True enough. But, this isn't about hitting 450 or 500 or even 550 home runs. He's done that. This is about getting to the mountain. This is about hitting a ton of home runs when you are old. As Sammy's bat speed diminishes, his lack of discipline is going to continue to hurt him. The fact is, you can pitch to him now. He can be gotten out.
If you are a regular reader or semi-regular reader of this site, you probably know that I held a contest to predict the 25-man Twins Roster for 2005. The winner of the contest will receive two tickets to a Twins game of their choice in 2005.* I had eight brave souls submit entries. Each of you should have gotten an e-mail indicating what number contestant you were. If you are unsure, e-mail me and I'll send you your number.
A while back, I published my own entries along with my thoughts on these players. Since then we've had a little movement and I thought I'd publish the results so far.
If you don't remember the rules, go back and read them. The maximum possible score is 325. I have listed the names of every player who showed up in at least one entry. I also have a column right after their name. If it has a zero after the name, that means I have determined that this player will not be on the 25-man roster to start 2005. So far, I have ruled out only three players, Jason Kubel (who's hurt), Omar Vizquel, who signed with San Francisco, and Cristian Guzman, who signed a ridiculous contract with the Washington (maybe) No-Names. I could have disqualified Jose Offerman, too, but hey, maybe next time.
The contestants are sorted left to right from lowest to highest scores. You'll note that contestant number 2 has quite a low number. That's because he listed Lew Ford twice, giving him both 23 and 20 points. As ultimate arbiter, Stick and Ball Guy did not throw out his entry (that would be no fun) but did not assign anyone on his list 20 points. This ruling is completely consistent with the rules, and if you have a question, go back and read them.
Shout Outs
Part of what I would like to do with this site is make it more interactive. I can write blah, blah, blah every day. But, I do like to hear from you. I appreciate the effort people made to enter the contest. I'll also give a shout out to everyone who has commented, including:
If you are not on the Shout Out list, never fear. SBG will put you there next time.
Now, the contest results to date:
Players | Contestants | |||||||||
2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | SBG | 4 | ||
Hunter | 1 | 13 | 23 | 25 | 25 | 24 | 24 | 25 | 24 | 21 |
Morneau | 1 | 24 | 25 | 23 | 22 | 18 | 25 | 22 | 25 | 19 |
Santana | 1 | 25 | 21 | 24 | 19 | 23 | 18 | 24 | 19 | 25 |
Ford | 1 | 23 | 22 | 20 | 23 | 22 | 22 | 23 | 23 | 20 |
Nathan | 1 | 22 | 18 | 18 | 21 | 25 | 19 | 21 | 21 | 23 |
Stewart | 1 | 19 | 12 | 17 | 24 | 17 | 23 | 20 | 15 | 22 |
Rincon | 1 | 11 | 17 | 19 | 20 | 19 | 17 | 19 | 20 | 24 |
Cuddyer | 1 | 14 | 24 | 22 | 16 | 16 | 21 | 18 | 22 | 6 |
Silva | 1 | 15 | 19 | 21 | 18 | 21 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 12 |
Blanco | 1 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 17 | 15 | 20 | 17 | 17 | 16 |
Crain | 1 | 17 | 16 | 12 | 11 | 20 | 15 | 14 | 14 | 9 |
Balfour | 1 | 21 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 14 | 16 | 5 | 7 |
Lohse | 1 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 5 | 14 | 13 | 11 | 7 | 13 |
Mauer | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | 13 | 4 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 17 |
Kubel | 0 | 18 | 20 | 15 | 12 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Punto | 1 | 0 | 11 | 13 | 8 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 16 | 2 |
Mays | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 5 | 11 | 12 | 8 | 15 |
Radke | 1 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 15 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 11 | 0 |
Koskie | 1 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 18 |
Romero | 1 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 8 |
Lecroy | 1 | 9 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 5 |
Durbin | 1 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 12 | 10 |
Tiffee | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
Restovich | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Rivas | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
Bartlett | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 1 |
Jones | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
Guzman | 0 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
Roa | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
Mulholland | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ojeda | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reese | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Vizquel | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Ryan | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Offerman | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Larkin | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Points | 280 | 305 | 307 | 312 | 314 | 318 | 320 | 322 | 325 |
*See disclaimer in original post. Stick and Ball Guy disqualified himself.
|W|P|110082470764338123|W|P|Contest Status|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.comIt's back! The Stick and Ball Guy's post mortem analysis of the 2004 Twins. In this installment, S&BG looks at the bright new star of the Twins, Lew Ford.
STICK AND BALL GUY'S 2004 TWINS ANALYZER | ||||
Lew Ford 6'0" 195 Lbs. Age: 28 R/R OF | ||||
AVE: .299 | OBP: .381 | SLG: .446 | GPA: .283 | |
G: 154 | AB: 569 | HR: 15 | RBI: 72 |
Offense Amazingly, Lew Ford started the season in the minors. When Torii Hunter pulled his hamstring in the first week of the season, the Twins called up Lew Ford to be a short term replacement. Ford started to hit immediately and never saw the minors again. Lew became a fan favorite, both for his supposedly quirky personality, as well as for his ability to play the game. When Ford got a hit or made a play, the Twins fans acknowledged it with a chant of Lewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!!!!
Unlike a lot of Twins, Lew showed some patience at the plate. His 67 walks led the team. In addition, Lew struck out just 75 times in 569 at bats. Lew had a nice OPS of .827, good for third (behind Justin Morneau and Corey Koskie) on the Twins for players over 250 at bats. His .381 OBP led the team. While he hit just 15 home runs (and just 2 of those came after July 28th), Ford also hit 31 doubles and 4 triples. Ford also hit nearly identical against righties and lefties. I that is another indicator that he did a nice job identifying and swinging at strikes.
Ford was extremely successful successful as a base stealer, swiping 20 bases while being caught just 2 times
Ford had a very nice season offensively forthe Twins. I don't think he really has as much talent as some of the other Twins. For example, he's clearly not as talented as Li'l Harmon or Torii Hunter. But he seems to have a much better idea of the strike zone. It's his patience and batting eye, I think that enabled Ford to be as successful as he was. Perhaps that is talent, perhaps it is a developed skill. However you wish to look at it, Ford has it, and it's rare on this team.
Defense
Lew Ford can hit. Lew Ford can also play defense. Ford is fast -- he can cut balls off. Ford can throw and he can catch the ball. When the Twins had Ford in the outfield along with Hunter and Jacque Jones, they had perhaps the best defensive outfield in the American League. The Twins gave up the lowest number of doubles in the American League, despite playing in a park with a very large left field. I think that a big reason for that is the great outfield defense that the Twins have, and a big part of that was Ford. He cut off balls, he hustled, he got to line drives. In short, he was superb.
Durability
Ford played in 154 games this year, even though he wasn't on the team to start the season. He missed just five games after being called up and never two in a row. Ford seems to be quite durable.
Salary Situation
Ford is still a serf. The Twins can pay him next to nothing in 2005.
Intangibles
Even though I really like Ford, and I love his approach at the plate, I worry a little bit about him future performance. Even though Ford was effectively a rookie, he's not a spring chicken. At 28, he's at the age that most players are in their primes. Very few players break in at his age and go on to long and successful careers. Ford tailed off in the second half, hitting .272/.404/.391/.795 in August and .276/.345/.347/.692 in September. These numbers aren't absolutely terrible, they do show that Ford was not driving the ball with power. Tom Kelly has said that you can't really judge a player until he's had 1000 at bats in the majors. Ford's got 642. This next season, I believe, will tell a lot. I like Ford, but I'm not as confident that he will continue to have the type of success that he had this year. I am hopeful that he will be able to continue his patience at the plate. He's got a lot of other tools to be successful.
Prediction
I think that Ford will experience a drop off in 2005. I don't think he will have a disastrous season, because he is able to put the ball into play. However, I am not confident that he will have a season in 2005 as successful as his 2004 campaign.
|W|P|110022701514066503|W|P|2004 Twins -- Lew Ford|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.comSTICK AND BALL GUY'S 2004 TWINS ANALYZER | ||||
Torii Hunter 6'2" 211 Lbs. Age: 29 R/R CF | ||||
AVE: .271 | OBP: .330 | SLG: .475 | GPA: .267 | |
G: 138 | AB: 520 | HR: 23 | RBI: 81 |
ESPN analyst Jon Kruk said there is only one statistic that should matter in the voting.
"I'm just always under the impression that the guy with the most wins is the best pitcher," said Kruk, who does not have a vote and admitted being biased toward his former Philadelphia Phillies teammate. "People at ESPN are into numbers and they say, 'Well, Santana's ERA is better and Schilling had more run support.' " Boston averaged seven runs in Schilling's starts; Minnesota averaged five runs in Santana's starts. "I understand that," Kruk said. "But what's the big thing for a pitcher? Win 20 games, right? You never hear, 'I want to win the ERA title.' They want to win."
...
"One game's huge," Kruk said.
By Fatso's logic, Carlos Silva (14 wins) is far and away a better pitcher than Brad Radke (11 wins). And Kenny Rogers (18 wins) is much, much better than Randy Johnson (16 wins).
Stick and Ball Guy reports, you decide.
|W|P|110020538640050747|W|P|Sweet|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.comKobe Bryant had 20 points on 4-for-19 shooting for the Lakers, who shot 37 percent. "It was a tough night for us as a unit," Bryant said. "I can go off solo and get 50 or 60 points on these guys, but that doesn't mean we're going to win."Who does this ass think he is? The rest of the team shot 42.1%, not great, but he shot 21 percent. He shot 21% for the game and his quote is "I can go off solo and get 50 or 60 points." Kobe, you DID go off solo. You drove off the best center in the NBA and a coach who has won nine championships. You are shooting 37.7% for the season. Later in the AP story, we get this.
Bryant's misses included three airballs in the third quarter when he hit only one of eight shots. He sat out the fourth quarter.We are now seeing what Kobe is like without a huge group of people around him. He's a selfish gunner. He thinks he's the best ever. Hogwash. He's not even Allen Iverson. He's not even Gary Payton. Update: Mr. Bryant told the LA Times after the game that he has plantar fasciitis. The LA Times, whose sportswriters may be slightly deferential to Bryant reported this, but did not report that his "I could have scored 50 or 60" comment. He's not expected to miss any games. At the risk of sounding like a conspiracy theorist, I will say that the timing of this announcement is, shall we say, interesting. |W|P|110018617992568660|W|P|I Just Can't Pass this Up|W|P|sbg@stickandballguy.com